Alabama Supreme Court Decisions

When a trustee must defend against an attack on his management of trust assets, the trustee is entitled to recover litigation expenses.  Regions Bank – ASC Case

Substituting defendant for fictitious party does not relate back where the plaintiff was not ignorant of defendant’s identity when describing fictitious parties in his original complaint. Ex parte Noland – ASC Case

Rule 54(b) certification is inappropriate where the judgment certified involves issues closely intertwined with claims still pending. Highlands of Lay – ASC Case

The Circuit Court lacked jurisdiction to enter judgment, because the plaintiff did not pay filing fee and the court had never approved the plaintiff’s statement of substantial hardship. Brandon Johnson – ASC Case

About southernappeal

Reporting on significant appellate court decisions and related news from the Eleventh Circuit and the Alabama Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal.
This entry was posted in Alabama Supreme Court, Fees and Costs, Fictitious Parties, Filing Fee, Jurisdiction, Relation Back, Rule 54(b), Statute of Limitations. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Alabama Supreme Court Decisions

  1. I really enjoy your blog post at http://southernappeal.
    wordpress.com/2012/08/10/alabama-supreme-court-decisions/!

    Essential material concerning this subject. Thank you for posting about it.

  2. You’re welcome! We hope you continue to find the blog useful. Let us know if there is other information you’d like to see posted here.

Leave a comment